Ki randizott Albucilla-szel?

Albucilla

Albucilla (1st-century) was a Roman noblewoman, the wife of Satrius Secundus, and was known for having had many lovers.

In the last year of the reign of the emperor Tiberius, 37 AD, she was accused of treason, or impiety, against the emperor (Latin: impietas in principem) along with Gnaeus Domitius Ahenobarbus, Vibius Marsus, and Lucius Arruntius, and imprisoned by command of the senate after attempting suicide.

Bővebben...
 

Lucius Arruntius

Lucius Arruntius (before 27 BC – 37 AD) was a Roman senator praised by the ancient Roman historian Tacitus. He lived throughout most of the reigns of the two first Roman emperors, Augustus and Tiberius. In 6 AD he was appointed consul, and then governor of Hispania Tarraconensis around 25 AD, which he governed in absentia for over 10 years. Throughout the latter part of his life he was plagued by hostility from the Praetorian Guard prefects, Sejanus and Macro, which culminated in his suicide in 37 AD after being arraigned on a trumped-up charge of irreverence to the then-emperor Tiberius.

Bővebben...
 

Albucilla

 

Decimus Laelius Balbus

Decimus Laelius Balbus was a Roman senator and delator or informer, active during the Principate. He was suffect consul in the nundinium of July-August 46 as the colleague of Marcus Junius Silanus.

His father has been identified as Decimus Laelius Balbus, consul in 6 BC. Balbus himself first enters history when in AD 37 he accused Acutia, the former wife of Publius Vitellius, of maiestas. Following her conviction, when the Senate voted on his reward, the plebeian tribune Junius Otho interposed with his veto. According to Tacitus, this gave rise to a feud between Vitellius and Otho which ended in Otho's banishment. That same year, Balbus was accused along with Albucilla, "notorious for the number of her lovers", was deprived of his rank as senator and exiled to an island, which was received "with intense satisfaction, as Balbus was noted for his savage eloquence and his eagerness to assail the innocent."

Apparently Balbus regained his status as senator for he became consul afterwards, although Steven Rutledge raises the possibility that it is his son who was suffect consul.

At some point in his career Balbus was involved in a famous legal case, the pro Voluseno Catulo, concerning Lucius Volusenus Catulus. While we know from Quintillian the names of his defenders, who include Gnaeus Domitius Afer and Gaius Passienus Crispus as well as Balbus, we know nothing of the charges, the verdict, or the prosecutors. Although one authority dates the case to before Balbus' banishment, Rutledge believes that since Balbus was restored to his former status "there is no reason not to attribute it to the reign of Gaius or the early part of Claudius' reign."

Laelius Balbus is known to have a daughter Laelia, a Vestal Virgin who died in the year 64.

Bővebben...
 

Albucilla

 

Gaius Vibius Marsus

Gaius Vibius Marsus, whom Tacitus calls "vetustis honoribus studiisque illustris", was a Roman senator active during the Principate. He was consul in 17 AD.

Bővebben...
 

Albucilla

 

Gnaeus Domitius Ahenobarbus

Gnaeus Domitius Ahenobarbus

Cnaeus Domitius Ahenobarbus (Kr. e. 11 decembere – Pyrgi, Etruria, Kr. u. 40 januárja) római politikus, az előkelő, plebeius származású Domitia gens Ahenobarbus-ágához tartozott. Édesapja, Lucius, Kr. e. 16-ban consuli rangot viselt, édesanyja, az idősebb Antonia pedig Marcus Antonius és Octavia lánya, a későbbi Augustus császár unokahúga volt. Gyermeke, akit szintén Luciusnak neveztek, később Nero néven a birodalom császára lett.

Életéről nem sokat tudunk. 32-ben consul, majd Sicilia proconsuli rangú helytartója lett. Felesége Germanicus lánya, Agrippina volt. Mindennemű bűnnel bemocskolta magát élete során, többek között bűnrészes volt Albucilla házasságtöréseiben, és vérfertőző viszonyban volt testvérével, Domitia Lepidával. Csak Tiberius halála mentette meg a kivégzéstől. Jómaga vízkórban halt meg.

Állítólag amikor gratuláltak neki fia születésekor, azt mondta, hogy ami tőle és Agrippinától származik, az csak pusztulást hozhat az országnak. Ez azonban nyilvánvalóan csak Suetonius utólagos jóslata, és ahogy apja esetében az egykorú történész adata ellentmond Suetonius sommás ítéletének, úgy Cnaeus esetében is inkább a későbbi történész Neróval szembeni elfogultsága dominál a Suetoniusnál lejegyzett számos botrányos, de pletykaszintű történetben. A szexuális bűncselekmények vádjai gyakoriak voltak a korabeli Rómában, és szinte mindig koncepciós perekhez szolgált alapul rabszolgákból kínvallatással kicsikart vallomások alapján. Caligula végül töröltette a Cnaeus ellen indított pereket.

Bővebben...